15 million dollar blackjack winner. Don Johnson, Wyoming CEO, Wins $ Million In Atlantic City | HuffPost
May 26, · Player wins $15 million in Atlantic City playing Blackjack. Home» Forum» Questions And Answers; Recommended online casinos. greenplayer. greenplayer. Joined: May 8, Threads: 2; Posts: 3; May 26th, at AM permalink. Does anybody have any comments on this? This guy is a professional in the gambling . May 23, · Las Vegas discussion forum – Casinos Can’t Stand $ Million Blackjack Winner, page 1. The Man Who Broke Atlantic City. Don Johnson won nearly $6 million playing blackjack in one night, single-handedly decimating the monthly revenue of .
Don Johnson, Wyoming CEO, Wins $15.1 Million In Atlantic City
Wortman noted that casino surveillance officers would have scrutinized every hand that Johnson played to make sure there was no cheating. Representatives of Borgata and Caesars said they do not identify gamblers because it is their policy to protect the privacy of patrons. He wouldn’t specify all the rules, but said they included a hand-shuffled six-deck shoe, s17 soft 17, or a hand of a total of 17 in which an ace is counted as 11 , and resplitting to at least four hands. Johnson, 49, who lives outside Philadelphia, is chief executive officer of Heritage Development LLC, a company that offers computer-assisted wagering in horseracing. For Don Johnson, it was an incredible streak of good luck at the Atlantic City blackjack tables. He ruined Tropicana’s table games revenue in April, driving the casino into the red for blackjack.
Player wins $15 million in Atlantic City playing Blackjack
For Don Johnson, it was an incredible streak of good luck at the Atlantic City blackjack tables. Eventually, someone would whack them. I’m just glad it was me.
He confirmed in two interviews with The Press of Atlantic City that he is the blackjack player who has been single-handedly scorching the casino industry in the past six months. His identity previously had been a mystery, known only to the casinos where he was a pampered high roller. Multiple sources in the casino industry confirmed the accuracy of Johnson’s story. I do have some losses in between.
As he became more proficient, he transitioned into high-stakes wagering. Johnson hardly fits the Hollywood image of a high roller. He is not decked out in Armani suits or Bruno Magli shoes. He does not drape himself in expensive jewelry.
He dresses casually in sports attire, preferring sweatshirts, jeans, sneakers and baseball caps from casinos he’s visited. In one interview, he showed up wearing a throwback Wrigley Field Chicago sweatshirt and a blue Nike T-shirt. He was clad in an Oregon State Beavers sweatshirt for the second interview. He grew up on a farm in Oregon and maintains a second home there, in Salem. By turning the tables on the casinos, Johnson destroyed the old adage that “the house always wins.
Benny began crawling onto Jake. forced or coerced someone into having intimate physical relations with you. (The person with the highest score gets to be giggled at for the rest of hisher life.
Benny laughed as he through Jake’s body into the river. “, Benny said. Needless to say, this slim and sexy brunette has few inhibitions. As it got deeper, he got more aroused, as he saw Jake’s naked buttocks moved apart, and little drops of blood dripped from his torn anus.
Apparently, he was right. Even with some losing sessions scattered among the big scores, he netted millions. In phone interviews for my column in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Johnson said he negotiated playing rules that cut the house edge to 0.
He wouldn’t specify all the rules, but said they included a hand-shuffled six-deck shoe, s17 soft 17, or a hand of a total of 17 in which an ace is counted as 11 , and resplitting to at least four hands. I just think somebody at the casinos missed the math when they did the numbers on it.
Johnson, 49, who lives outside Philadelphia, is chief executive officer of Heritage Development LLC, a company that offers computer-assisted wagering in horseracing. He once managed Philadelphia Park racetrack, years before it became Parx Casino.
He said his blackjack arrangement was “like going to the horse races and betting an even-money shot and only having to spend 80 cents on the dollar to get that shot. Johnson said his Atlantic City deal made it advantageous to play only one spot. One or the other. It could have happened in the first five hands. I would have left, came back the next day, and started over. I would have gotten the discount starting over again. Under those rules, long term they can’t win,” he said.
They’ve corrected their error, and I’ve got to think about it now. The game isn’t nearly as good as it was. You have to play a larger sample size of hands, so the negative edge that the house has over you has a bigger chance of catching hold.
Blackjack 3 to 2 or 6 to 5
In blackjack, players receive two cards and then decide if they want to “hit” and get more cards, or “stand” and use the cards they already have. The goal is to get a higher score than the dealer, based on the values of the cards, without going over Should you do this, you get a payout of 1-to-1; you win as much money as you bet.
A special situation happens when the first two cards dealt are a 10 and an ace valued at 11 , adding up to 21 right away, a situation called a natural blackjack. In this case, the standard payout, and the old rule at the Venetian and Palazzo, is 3-to This seems like a small change, but it has a pretty serious effect on the game. Natural blackjacks are not completely uncommon; about 1 in 20 hands will come up with a natural The rule change means that the casinos will be paying out quite a bit less money.
In terms of the industry, the rule change greatly increases the “house edge. Games are set up to be slightly unfair to players in the long run, paying out a little bit less in total than what is taken in. The house edge is usually expressed as a percentage.
Using this handy blackjack house-edge calculator from gambling analysis site Wizard of Odds , we can see what will happen to players at the Venetian and Palazzo under the new rules. Here is the output from the calculator using a fairly standard set of Las Vegas blackjack rules, with the 3-to-2 natural blackjack payout: Wizard of Odds Note that in this case, the house edge — assuming a player is following the strategy that maximizes his or her chances of winning — is just 0.
Now, we use the same set of rules, but with the 6-to-5 payout: Wizard of Odds This is dramatically worse for the players. The house edge with a perfectly playing gambler is now 1. This makes playing blackjack at the Palazzo and the Venetian a far less attractive proposition. Players have much worse chances of coming out ahead.